The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Immigration’s ‘extraordinary ability’ standard is a moving target

us constitution
Getty Images
us constitution

Extraordinary. It’s not a word that we see a lot of these days. Yet, anyone who works in fashion encounters the extraordinary daily. That’s because the industry’s ranks are filled with singularly talented creative professionals who come from around the globe to work in a variety of jobs, all facing the same challenge: Immigration.

In most cases, their way in is through the O visa, which is reserved for foreign workers with demonstrably “extraordinary ability.” While the path to establishing this ability has always been something of a challenge, we are seeing trends in immigration that have made obtaining an O visa harder than ever. This shift threatens not only careers, but the reputation of the U.S. as the first destination for the world’s best and brightest.

{mosads}When Congress introduced the O visa, under the Immigration of Act of 1990, it was effectively codifying the impossible. That’s because the central premise of the O visa is that it is possible to identify “extraordinary” talent through the receipt of a major award like a Nobel Prize or an Oscar, or by satisfying specific evidentiary criteria. That ability can be boiled down to regulatory arithmetic may seem anathema to the American concept of individuality, but that’s exactly how United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines who may (or may not) enter the country to provide work as extraordinary individuals. 

Because the elements of the extraordinary are different for, say, a data scientist and a footwear designer, the O is broken into different categories — the O-1A recognizes extraordinary ability in the sciences, business, athletics and academics, while the O-1B is reserved for the arts. Both require a foreign worker to submit evidence that satisfies three categories from a specific list (eight for the O-1A, six for the O-1B). The O-1B criteria are intended to be representative of the kind of evidence indicative of meaningful achievements in creative professions, such as a history of starring roles in distinguished productions or magazine articles about an individual in major publications. But there is still a burden to establish that an alien has truly achieved distinction in the field that places them “substantially above” what is ordinarily encountered. At least, that’s how things used to be.

In recent years, immigration attorneys who regularly secure visas for creatives like fashion designers, models and photographers have experienced an unprecedented level of push-back from immigration authorities. Evidence that previously met the regulatory standard is now frequently disqualified through narrow technicalities or in some cases simply ignored. 

Industry standards are also routinely disregarded, such as when an itinerary showing three-years’ worth of contracted employment is required, even though short-term engagements are common throughout the fashion industry. 

The reasoning behind these challenges — typically communicated by USCIS after an application is submitted via the dreaded “Request for Evidence” — is often labored, inaccurate and frustratingly terse.

What does this mean for the future of fashion? In the short term, delays in the issuance of visas as attorneys scramble to adjust to trends in review by USCIS. Long term it could lead to widespread disenfranchisement, with creative talents deciding that the bar to entry to the U.S. is too high, skipping New York and Los Angeles in favor of cities like Paris or Shanghai.

All is not lost, though. As the tides change politically, we will undoubtedly see new approaches and ideas for immigration, particularly as it applies to extraordinary individuals. Immigration attorneys are also adapting, and we are increasingly using the same kind of creative skills displayed by our clients to present compelling stories that can overcome bureaucratic cynicism. 

Ultimately it will come down to the industry itself to decide what — and who — it wants to look like. Fashion is more than just sartorial contrivance — it’s a mode of communication, a means of creative expression, and it is a cultural force that touches every aspect of the arts. It’s also a multi-billion dollar industry that is made up of some of the most talented and influential individuals in the world. With time and effort, we can show the world that America is a home for the extraordinary, no matter where they come from.

Michael Wildes is the managing partner of Wildes and Weinberg P.C., specializing in immigration law. Wildes is an immigration attorney for first lady Melania Trump and her family. Wildes is a former federal prosecutor and the Democratic mayor of Englewood, New Jersey. Follow him on Twitter at @Michael_Wildes.

Tags green card Immigration Immigration News Melania Trump Visa

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Regular the hill posts

Main Area Bottom ↴

Top Stories

See All

Most Popular

Load more