Hillary for Secretary of State?

What? Really? Why would Barack “No Drama” Obama appoint Hillary “Oscar for Drama” Clinton? The mainstream media seem to think this is a great idea — probably because they think that having Hillary on staff will keep her from rocking the boat, and also, I am sure, because the MSM loves drama.

Obama supposedly wants to create a “Team of Rivals,” much like Abraham Lincoln, a favorite president of Obama’s. But will Hillary be an asset or a obstacle on the road to change?

The latter is more likely. The Clintons basically are the DLC. Wikipedia describes the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) as: the powerful, corporate-financed mouthpiece within the Democratic Party — or “the Republican Wing of the Democratic Party.” We don’t need that. The DLC is the reason I don’t like Bill Clinton. He sold us out to corporations at every opportunity.

I think it’s a bad idea. Obama should pick Bill Richardson. He never called Obama naive for wanting to talk to our “enemies” or said that McCain was more ready to be president than Obama. Remember that awful “3 a.m.” commercial?

The MSM always talks about Hillary like she got here on her own. She has ridden Bill’s coattails her entire career. Do you think she would be a senator if she weren’t a Clinton? And that isn’t sexist, that’s real. We need real change, and Hillary is too entangled with corporate interests to do the right things. I mean, how do you think we got into all these unfair trade agreements in the first place? That’s where all our jobs went. Bogus.