Lawmakers are scrambling to wrap up their work ahead of a one-week recess while also juggling growing concerns about a widespread outbreak of the coronavirus within the United States.
Congress has a slew of bills set to clear before lawmakers prepare to leave Washington as early as Thursday, including soon-to-expire surveillance legislation, a House bill on President Trump’s travel ban and a mammoth energy package.
All of that will play as lawmakers are sure to field growing questions about the spread of the coronavirus within the U.S., and the potential impact both in Washington and across the country.
As of Sunday, 34 states had reports of coronavirus cases, according to CNN and The New York Times, while Washington, D.C., also confirmed its first case over the weekend.
And increasing the direct impact on Capitol Hill, two lawmakers — Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) — both announced Sunday that they are self-quarantining after interacting with an individual at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) who has since been diagnosed with the coronavirus.
Cruz, in a statement, said that he felt “fine and healthy,” but he will remain in Texas this week “out of an abundance of caution.”
“The medical authorities explicitly advised me that … the people who have interacted with me in the 10 days since CPAC should not be concerned about potential transmission,” he said. “Nevertheless … because of how frequently I interact with my constituents as part of my job and to give everyone peace of mind, I have decided to remain at my home in Texas this week, until a full 14 days have passed since the CPAC interaction.”
Gosar added in a tweet that he and three of his senior staff are self-quarantined.
“We are all asymptomatic and feel great. But we are being proactive and cautious,” Gosar tweeted, adding that his office will be closed this week.
The announcements come amid rampant chatter on Capitol Hill about the potential impact the coronavirus could have on the building’s day-to-day workings. The House is preparing to allow staff to telework as concerns grow over the global coronavirus outbreak, and Senate staffers also received an email last week about teleworking.
Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Sunday night laid out initial goal posts for any potential economic stimulus package as concerns about a widespread outbreak have roiled the stock market.
The Washington Post reported late last week that administration officials were considering deferring taxes for the sectors most affected by the outbreak, including the hospitality, cruise, travel and airline industries. Trump has also floated a payroll tax cut.
“We are hoping to work with the administration on a coordinated, government-wide plan to respond to the coronavirus,” the two Democratic leaders said. “However, President Trump continues to manufacture needless chaos within his administration, and it is hampering the government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak.”
The two want any package to include paid sick leave, bolstered unemployment insurance and “widespread and free” testing for the coronavirus.
Surveillance
Lawmakers are barreling toward a deadline for three expiring provisions of the USA Freedom Act with no plan in sight for how to extend them.
Though Congress technically has until March 15 — Sunday — to reauthorize, change or formally end the intelligence programs, the House is expected to hold last votes for the week on Thursday. That gives lawmakers just four days to get a deal on either a short-term extension or a larger reauthorization.
Neither the House nor Senate has been able to advance legislation at the committee level or on the floor that deals with the expiring provisions, which are related to roving wiretaps, lone wolf surveillance and a controversial phone records program.
Part of the problem for leadership is a push, from members on both sides of the aisle, to use the USA Freedom bill to make broader changes to the court associated with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Progressives and libertarian-minded GOP senators have raised concerns about the court for years, believing that it does not provide enough privacy protections for those targeted for surveillance or transparency about its activities.
But the concern about potential abuse grew among Republicans after Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz found 17 instances of significant inaccuracies and omissions in the warrant applications related to Trump campaign associate Carter Page.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) are leading talks amid a small group of lawmakers to try to find a potential deal ahead of the end-of-week deadline.
Hoyer said on Thursday they had sent an offer back to the Republicans, but indicated that the focus on making broader FISA reforms was slowing down the talks.
“The focus on a non-related … issue is slowing up this process. And I would hope that in the coming days, because the 15th is upon us, we come to an agreement,” Hoyer said.
Both Attorney General William Barr and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) support a clean reauthorization of the USA Freedom provisions. But in a curveball, Trump told Republican lawmakers at the White House last week that he would not reauthorize the intelligence programs without broader FISA reforms.
That, and the looming deadline, is bolstering talk of a potential short-term patch to give lawmakers more time to negotiate a deal on changes to the surveillance court. How long of an extension Congress could agree to, and Trump would sign, remains unclear.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who is pushing broader FISA reforms, has indicated that he thinks the president will only sign a weeks-long extension. But Sen. John Thune (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, said lawmakers should look at a two- to three-month extension.
“The question is, does the president and do the people who don’t want to see any extension at all make it difficult to get that done?” Thune added.
Travel ban
The House is slated to take up legislation to repeal Trump’s controversial travel ban this week.
The measure — introduced by Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) — aims to rein in the president’s ability to “suspend or restrict aliens from entering the United States” and limit the administration from putting in place similar bans in the future. It also includes language that would prevent “religious discrimination in various immigration-related decisions, such as whether to issue an immigrant or non-immigrant visa, with certain exceptions.”
“This bill would repeal the president’s Muslim travel ban and prevent the administration from putting in place other discriminatory travel bans,” Hoyer said on the floor.
In January 2017, Trump issued the first iteration of the travel ban on seven majority-Muslim countries, which was met with strong pushback from Democrats and faced a series of legal challenges. The third version of the ban, which was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018, impacts Iran, North Korea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Venezuela. In January 2020, Trump announced immigration restrictions on six additional countries: Myanmar, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Sudan, Tanzania and Nigeria.
Republican allies of the president have shot down accusation that the ban is discriminatory or unconstitutional, with several GOP lawmakers noting it was upheld by the Supreme Court.
“I understand there was a disagreement over whether or not you supported the president’s ability to restrict travel from certain countries based on not whether they were a Muslim country, but based on whether or not they were a country not in compliance with our Department of Homeland Security requirements and criteria to ensure that they are properly vetting people that come to our country for national security purposes,” House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said on the floor on Thursday.
“There were limited number of countries back in 2017 that the president ultimately determined working through the Department of Homeland Security were not in compliance,” he added.
The bill passed out of the House Judiciary Committee in February.
The House will also take up the Access to Counsel Act, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), which would ensure individuals detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection are granted access to legal counsel.
“This legislation would make certain that those held or detained while attempting to enter the united states are guaranteed access to legal counsel. That legal counsel, Mr. Speaker, would not be paid for by the government,” Hoyer said.
Jayapal, in a statement in January, noted that Jan. 27, 2020 was the third anniversary of the “xenophobic and unconstitutional Muslim Ban.”
“The recent accounts of Customs and Border Protection officers unjustly detaining Iranian Americans at the border crossing in Blaine, Washington, are a stark reminder that this Administration’s attacks on civil liberties are far from over,” she added.
Ukraine probe
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will vote this week on the first subpoena to come from a months-long investigation into Hunter Biden and Burisma Holdings.
Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has scheduled a vote for Wednesday on a subpoena for documents from an interview with former Blue Star Strategies consultant Andrii Telizhenko.
Johnson, in a letter sent earlier this month to committee members, said that Telizhenko has indicated that he wants to cooperate fully with the investigation, but is currently limited by a nondisclosure agreement.
Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) is opposed to the subpoena. He wrote to Johnson over the weekend requesting a closed-door FBI briefing prior to the committee vote.
Because Peters is opposed, Johnson will need a simple majority on the panel where Republicans hold eight seats compared to six for Democrats.
Johnson is expected to get the votes after Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), who had previously expressed concern that the probe appeared “political,” announced that he would support the subpoena. Liz Johnson, a spokeswoman for Romney, said Johnson confirmed to the Utah senator that “any interview of the witness would occur in a closed setting without a hearing or public spectacle.”
Republicans have homed in on Hunter Biden’s work on the board of Burisma and the discredited narrative that then-Vice President Joe Biden tried to remove Ukrainian Prosecutor Viktor Shokin in an effort to protect his son. No evidence has indicated that either of the Bidens engaged in criminal wrongdoing, and there was widespread concern at the time both internationally and from a bipartisan coalition in Congress about corruption within Shokin’s office.
Energy bill
The Senate is set to wrap up a wide-ranging energy bill by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
The Senate will take its first procedural vote to wind down debate on the 550-page bill on Monday evening. That could pave the way for the chamber to pass the bill on Tuesday or Wednesday.
The legislation incorporates more than 50 bills including promoting research in up and coming renewable energies. It also includes efforts to bolster the capture of carbon pollution, including from the coal and natural gas sector, as well as research to expand nuclear energy.
But debate on the Senate floor has largely been stalled as lawmakers grappled behind-the-scenes on potential amendment votes.
War powers resolution
The House could take up a Senate-passed resolution to rein in Trump’s ability to take military action against Iran without congressional signoff.
Hoyer said on Thursday that the House could take up Sen. Tim Kaine’s (D-Va.) resolution as soon as this week. The House Rules Committee is expected to meet Monday night to establish the parameters for floor debate on the resolution, paving the way for a vote on the House floor.
The resolution requires Trump to pull any U.S. troops from military hostilities against Iran within 30 days unless he gets congressional approval for the military actions.
It passed the Senate last month in a 55-45 vote, including the support of eight Republicans. It is expected to pass the House once it comes up for a vote. But Trump has threatened to veto the resolution, and neither chamber is expected to have the two-thirds support necessary to override.