The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Re: Fee Raise for Pass to Recreate on Federal Land

I first instituted the National Parks Fee Demonstration Program back in 1997, which had widespread support, and even in my bill I cautioned against expanding the program to other federal lands, mainly because of what we’re seeing now – a fee that doesn’t put money back into the site being impacted. Parks are a completely different animal than other federal lands.

I had opposed the recreation fee being expanded beyond the national parks and now my worst fears are being realized – higher fees with no guarantee that the money is going back to the site being impacted.

An $80 fee is certainly higher than what folks should have to pay to recreate on federal lands. My concerns about the price of the pass are echoed in a study conducted by the University of Wyoming, which showed very little tolerance for a pass priced above $70.

If there’s a budget problem in our land management agencies, let’s get to the root of it – address it head on – and not put budget shortfalls on the backs of recreational visitors.

Tags Fee Pricing

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Regular the hill posts

Main Area Top ↴
Main Area Bottom ↴

Most Popular

Load more