The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Immunity Prevents Disclosure of Sensitive Intelligence (Sen. Orrin Hatch)

Wednesday’s Judiciary Committee hearing on the FISA Amendments Act included powerful and persuasive testimony from the Department of Justice. I am hopeful that my Judiciary colleagues observed and understood the relevant testimony which explained the necessity for immunity for private lawsuits against telecommunication companies alleged to have assisted the government after the heinous attacks of Sept.11. As long as these frivolous lawsuits continue, there is an increased likelihood that classified sources and methods of our intelligence community will be unnecessarily disclosed. Make no mistake; indemnification is an unacceptable response for myriad reasons. Limited and appropriate immunity, which is represented in the bipartisan FISA Amendments Act, is the best solution to a difficult situation.

Tags 110th United States Congress Armed Attack Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act Government Immunity Law Mass surveillance National security Orrin Hatch Privacy law Privacy of telecommunications Signals intelligence

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Regular the hill posts

Main Area Top ↴

THE HILL MORNING SHOW

Main Area Bottom ↴

Most Popular

Load more