The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Endangered Species Act Needs Reform

I believe the Endangered Species Act’s intention of protecting species is good, but I believe those good intentions have gone off track. The law is failing to lead to the de-listing of species.

In the 30 years that ESA has been around, more than 1,300 species have been listed as threatened or endangered. Oddly enough though, only a handful of species have recovered to the point of being de-listed, because agencies do not have clear standards about when a species should be de-listed.

I believe that we must protect species that are truly threatened or endangered, but we cannot lose sight of the real goal: recovery and delisting. The law should be supported by sound science and need, and be accompanied by a recovery plan that will lead to de-listing.

I will look forward to talking more about this important issue when I take it to the Senate floor next week.

Tags Conservation Conservation in the United States Ecology Endangered species Endangered Species Act Environment Threatened species United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Regular the hill posts

Main Area Top ↴
Main Area Bottom ↴

Most Popular

Load more